No noticeable loss in performance.
+ This still gives us the 0ms lag on settings() (which is what we fixed in the previous MP: Bug #1567429)
+ I still see that cool behaviour where the scope starts up quickly, then the settings cog appears as soon as child scopes are loaded.
« Back to merge proposal
No noticeable loss in performance.
+ This still gives us the 0ms lag on settings() (which is what we fixed in the previous MP: Bug #1567429)
+ I still see that cool behaviour where the scope starts up quickly, then the settings cog appears as soon as child scopes are loaded.