> I just noticed that there is also a call to system() in SSRegistryObject. I
> don't think we ever have both RegistryObject and SSRegistryObject instantiated
> in the same process, so we can't race there. But this suggests that we
> probably should have a utility class that wraps calls to system so they are
> serialised.
> I just noticed that there is also a call to system() in SSRegistryObject. I
> don't think we ever have both RegistryObject and SSRegistryObject instantiated
> in the same process, so we can't race there. But this suggests that we
> probably should have a utility class that wraps calls to system so they are
> serialised.
done