Merge lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits into lp:leo-editor

Proposed by Matt Wilkie
Status: Needs review
Proposed branch: lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits
Merge into: lp:leo-editor
Diff against target: 76 lines (+16/-6)
1 file modified
leo/doc/LeoDocs.leo (+16/-6)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
The Leo editor team Pending
Review via email: mp+191938@code.launchpad.net

Commit message

a few minor edits to LeoDocs.leo >> Preliminaries

Description of the change

a few minor edits to LeoDocs.leo >> Preliminaries.

They are suggestions, feel free to pick and choose the ones you like.

To post a comment you must log in.
lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits updated
6172. By Matt Wilkie

add best guess for date of Joe's endorsement. (On general principle I think all of the long quotes should be dated, and, where possible linked to the first post)

6173. By Matt Wilkie

one typo, and fix formatting on a numbered list

Revision history for this message
Edward K. Ream (edreamleo) wrote :

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Matt Wilkie <email address hidden> wrote:

> Matt Wilkie has proposed merging lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits into
> lp:leo-editor.
>

​Thanks for the edits. I'll review them and merge by hand into LeoDocs.leo.

Edward

Revision history for this message
Matt Wilkie (maphew) wrote :

you're welcome. :)

Since it appears hand merging is a preferred workflow to using launchpad,
is there are also a better way to give you corrections?

I used bzr because of the simpleness of using the commit message to share
the reasoning behind each of the changes.

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Edward K. Ream <email address hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Matt Wilkie <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Matt Wilkie has proposed merging lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits into
> > lp:leo-editor.
> >
>
> Thanks for the edits. I'll review them and merge by hand into LeoDocs.leo.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits/+merge/191938
> You are the owner of lp:~maphew/leo-editor/doc-edits.
>

Revision history for this message
Edward K. Ream (edreamleo) wrote :

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Matt Wilkie <email address hidden> wrote:

> you're welcome. :)
>
> Since it appears hand merging is a preferred workflow to using launchpad,
> ​ ​
> is there are also a better way to give you corrections?
>
> I used bzr because of the simpleness of using the commit message to share
> ​ ​
> the reasoning behind each of the changes.
>

​The bzr diffs suffice, I think. But you could simply describe the
corrections if that is easier for you.

Edward

Revision history for this message
Edward K. Ream (edreamleo) wrote :

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Matt Wilkie <email address hidden> wrote:

a few minor edits to LeoDocs.leo >> Preliminaries.
>
> They are suggestions, feel free to pick and choose the ones you like.
>

​Done. Thanks for your help.

Edward

Unmerged revisions

6173. By Matt Wilkie

one typo, and fix formatting on a numbered list

6172. By Matt Wilkie

add best guess for date of Joe's endorsement. (On general principle I think all of the long quotes should be dated, and, where possible linked to the first post)

6171. By Matt Wilkie

Joe Orr's website is gone, perhaps the Web Archive?

6170. By Matt Wilkie

Corrected date and linked to the public posting for Speed's mini Leo review

6169. By Matt Wilkie

unattributed quote now attributed to anonymous

6168. By Matt Wilkie

'traditional editors' instead of 'any other'; sounds less arrogant, and admits possib.of another editor which could do this, possibly (we just don't know about it).

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
1=== modified file 'leo/doc/LeoDocs.leo'
2--- leo/doc/LeoDocs.leo 2013-10-19 23:56:05 +0000
3+++ leo/doc/LeoDocs.leo 2013-10-21 05:41:35 +0000
4@@ -3261,7 +3261,7 @@
5 .. .. |leoAtFileNamedChild| image:: screen-shots/leo-qt-at-file-named-child.JPG
6 </t>
7 <t tx="ekr.20050830074815.1">"I am using Leo since a few weeks and I brim over with enthusiasm for it. I
8-think it is the most amazing software since the invention of the spreadsheet."
9+think it is the most amazing software since the invention of the spreadsheet." -- Anon
10
11 "We who use Leo know that it is a breakthrough tool and a whole new way of
12 writing code." -- Joe Orr
13@@ -3315,7 +3315,9 @@
14
15 </t>
16 <t tx="ekr.20050830074815.11"></t>
17-<t tx="ekr.20050830074815.12">September 3, 2002
18+<t tx="ekr.20050830074815.12">.. _`on slashdot`:http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=38848&amp;cid=4171478
19+
20+August 28, 2002 `on slashdot`_.
21
22 Hello, my full name is David Speed Ream. I am known as Speed to friends and
23 enemies alike, but I gladly answer to David or most any other handle. I am an
24@@ -3398,7 +3400,9 @@
25 Enough of this commentary, I just looked at the clock. Best wishes to anyone
26 willing to try Leo for a week. I hope you will be glad you did.
27 </t>
28-<t tx="ekr.20050830074815.13">The Word outlines are very useful. But Leo makes Word look like a clunky toy.
29+<t tx="ekr.20050830074815.13">_circa 2005_
30+
31+The Word outlines are very useful. But Leo makes Word look like a clunky toy.
32
33 #1 Reason would probably be clone nodes. One node can point to another. Another
34 way of putting this is is that a leaf can be on more than one tree. For
35@@ -3409,6 +3413,7 @@
36 put a new species, you could put the species under two simultaneously. In
37 effect, you can build a 3-D tree. For a further illustration see
38 http://www.3dtree.com/ev/e/sbooks/leo/sbframetoc_ie.htm
39+(domain shut down, perhaps try the `Web Archive`_)
40
41 #2 Reason would probably be that Leo outlines can be embedded in external text
42 files. So, a Leo outline is more than an outline, it is a meta-structure that
43@@ -3427,17 +3432,22 @@
44 edited separately.
45
46 Some other cool things about Leo which Word doesn't feature:
47+
48 1. Pure xml output that is easy to transform into other formats (next
49 version of Word will have true XML format, but not as easy to work with).
50 One consequence of this is that Leo files can be transformed pretty easily
51 to web pages with their outlining capability intact.
52+
53 2. Easy to add features since is programmed in Python and open source. Maybe
54 your average user can't start hacking on it, but a surprising amount can be
55-tacked on...
56-.. by flipping through the Tk manual.
57+tacked on by flipping through the Tk manual.
58+
59 3. Free, opensource, multi-platform
60+
61 4. Leo is scriptable with Python. It should be possible to build a Tickler
62 into Leo using Python scripting, for example.
63+
64+.. _`Web Archive`:http://web.archive.org/web/http://www.3dtree.com/ev/e/sbooks/leo/sbframetoc_ie.htm
65 </t>
66 <t tx="ekr.20050830074815.14">First of all, kudos to you for the excellent progress you've been making with
67 Leo. I upgraded today after about three months of using and older version and I
68@@ -22536,7 +22546,7 @@
69 outline's data, but the outline structure as well.
70
71 - Features such as @test nodes and @button nodes can not even be *thought*
72- in any other editor. Leo implements such features easily; other editors
73+ in traditional editors. Leo implements such features easily; other editors
74 could only simulate them--laboriously and unnaturally.
75
76 - Leo's outlines are based `Directed Acyclic Graphs`_. As a result, Leo can

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches