> Ah ok did not look at the statistical error. Thanks.
> Just for curiosity. Did you use MC technique for the integration or are you
> using simpson? (so much faster in this case)
Normal MC integration. Note that for NLO processes, you always have 3 more integration dimensions compared to LO, so I doubt that Simpson is much faster. In particular for anything beyond 1->2 decays.
Hi Olivier,
> Ah ok did not look at the statistical error. Thanks.
> Just for curiosity. Did you use MC technique for the integration or are you
> using simpson? (so much faster in this case)
Normal MC integration. Note that for NLO processes, you always have 3 more integration dimensions compared to LO, so I doubt that Simpson is much faster. In particular for anything beyond 1->2 decays.
Cheers,
Rikkert