Code review comment for lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.2-alpha0

Revision history for this message
marco zaro (marco-zaro) wrote :

Hello both
thanks for the reviews.
I have removed the models rom the branch and added to the UFOmodel one. I should have taken care of all the other comments in revision 1002.

Cheers,

Marco

> On 17 Sep 2021, at 09:54, Olivier Mattelaer <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have given a quick look and this sounds very good.
>
> - I agree with Rikkert that it is better to put the model online (maybe not on the Feynrules website but on our madgraph website) the branch lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/UFOmodel_db is designed for that actually.
>
> - I'm worried about the re-introduction of the fortran function SORTTI and SORTTC.
> If I remember correctly, such function had some issue with GCC10, did you check.
>
> I do not see in the diff any kind of test (maybe it is just truncated). Can you add at least on parralel test such that I can run it on various GCC version and check that they are no issue on that.
>
> Did you add unittest for the new syntax? if not I will likely add those when running some tests.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.2-alpha0/+merge/408723
> Your team MadDevelopers is subscribed to branch lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.2.1.
>

« Back to merge proposal