I would like to put this quite high priority for this week (i.e. for me Wednesday-friday).
I have rerun the tests and found that some tests are crashing when run via the full script but are working if run alone. So I have run (the very slow script to determine which of the tests had such side effects and the culprint is:
tests.unit_tests.fks.test_extra_ew.TestAMCatNLOEW.test_generate_fks_2to1_no_finalstate_confs
which has a side effect that lead to the following crash:
FAIL: test_generate_fks_ew_dijet_qed2qcd2_qcd (tests.unit_tests.fks.test_extra_ew.TestAMCatNLOEW)
check that the generate command works as expected.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/omattelaer/Documents/workspace/3.0.1/tests/unit_tests/fks/test_extra_ew.py", line 869, in test_generate_fks_ew_dijet_qed2qcd2_qcd
self.assertEqual(real.fks_infos[0]['extra_cnt_index'], -1)
AssertionError: 0 != -1
Might be interesting that you take a look. But I think that we should release this version this week independently.
Hi,
I would like to put this quite high priority for this week (i.e. for me Wednesday-friday).
I have rerun the tests and found that some tests are crashing when run via the full script but are working if run alone. So I have run (the very slow script to determine which of the tests had such side effects and the culprint is: tests.fks. test_extra_ ew.TestAMCatNLO EW.test_ generate_ fks_2to1_ no_finalstate_ confs
tests.unit_
which has a side effect that lead to the following crash:
FAIL: test_generate_ fks_ew_ dijet_qed2qcd2_ qcd (tests. unit_tests. fks.test_ extra_ew. TestAMCatNLOEW) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- omattelaer/ Documents/ workspace/ 3.0.1/tests/ unit_tests/ fks/test_ extra_ew. py", line 869, in test_generate_ fks_ew_ dijet_qed2qcd2_ qcd assertEqual( real.fks_ infos[0] ['extra_ cnt_index' ], -1)
check that the generate command works as expected.
-------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/
self.
AssertionError: 0 != -1
Might be interesting that you take a look. But I think that we should release this version this week independently.
Any objection? comment?
Olivier