Code review comment for lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1

Revision history for this message
marco zaro (marco-zaro) wrote :

Ciao Olivier,
thanks for looking at this.
Let me answer inline

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:30 PM Olivier Mattelaer <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> Update on my side:
> 1) the IOTest suite are bugged (not critical for a release) I have ask
> Valentin to look at it
> 2) the (fast) parrelel test leads to their own discovery of bug:
>
> 2.1) e+ e- > t t~ [real=QCD]
> crashes with
> FKSProcessError: This process does not have any correction up to NLO in
> QED,QCD
> [ test: test_short_check_generate_events_nlo_py6pt_fsr]
> same for e+ e- > p p p [real=QCD] in test:
> test_short_check_eejjj_lo_lhapdf]
>
> for ee collisions, one has to tell the code
set include_lepton_initiated_processes True (there is a message printed on
screen).
The py6isr test should be skipped, as the has_isr flag is not updated
anymore in this branch (there were some print statement about this you
asked me to remove)

  If you want to include it, set the

  'include_lepton_initiated_processes' option to True

> 2.2) A division by zero occurs in the jet veto of rik
> [test_short_jet_veto_xsec]
>
> p p > e+ ve [QCD]
> generate_events NLO
> set ickkw -1
> set ptj 10
>
>
> the jet_veto is likely to be broken in this branch. There are some message
errors in the logs of the fortran executables about this.

> 2.3) The value of some squared order amplitude does not match anymore
> [test_short_sqso ]
> Will look at this one (maybe with Valentin).
>

I will check this right away

Thanks again!

cheers,

Marco

>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 22:00, marco zaro <<email address hidden><mailto:
> <email address hidden>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Again,
> actually, doing p p > e+ ve [LOonly] works ok, at LO, NLO, aMC@LO, aMC@NLO
> So it may be something relate to the phase-space of 2->1?
> the reason why p p > w+ [LOonly] returns zero is because the function
> passcuts always returns False, exiting here
> c Make sure have reasonable 4-momenta
> if (p(0,1) .le. 0d0) then
> passcuts=.false.
> return
> endif
>
> with P(0,1) = -99
>
> So clearly something goes wrong in the phase space generation. Rikkert,
> anything that could be related to the granny stuff?
>
> also note that
> p p > w+ [QED] has one test failing (soft test for photon emission off the
> W), where a lot of NaN’s appear
> p p > e+ ve [QCD] seems ok though
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 21:42, marco zaro <<email address hidden><mailto:
> <email address hidden>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier,
> it is strange, it seems that the LOonly mode is broken (it always returns
> zero)
> I will have a look on monday, and let you know.
>
> cheers,
>
> Marco
>
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 21:10, Olivier Mattelaer <<email address hidden>
> <mailto:<email address hidden>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> The following test is also not passing (going trough ok with 2.6.4):
> test_madspin_LOonly
>
> Even though this is a madspin designed tests, it actually crash within the
> LOonly module.
> If you just do
> geneate p p > w+ [LOonly]
> It will lead to a crash.
>
> I have fixed all the other tests (but a couple of IOtests and i still have
> to run the short paralel test).
>
> Since this is a beta version, we can also decide to not fix this in this
> version.
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1/+merge/356133
> You are requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1 into
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/FKS_EW_granny.
>
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1/+merge/356133
> You are requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1 into
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/FKS_EW_granny.
>
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1/+merge/356133
> You are requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1 into
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/FKS_EW_granny.
>
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1/+merge/356133
> You are requested to review the proposed merge of
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.1 into
> lp:~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/FKS_EW_granny.
>

« Back to merge proposal