I agree with your proposal Rafael. It will require changes in src:resource-agents and src:fence-agents but nothing in this MP, am I right? But with the following proposal I believe no changes will be needed in src:heartbeat:
- In src:resource-agents create a transitional binary package called resource-agents which will depend on resource-agents-unsupported and resource-agents-supported.
+ It will require a rename of current resource-agents (unsupported agents) to resource-agents-unsupported.
- In src:fence-agents create a new transitional binary package called fence-agents which will depend on resource-agents-unsupported and resource-agents-supported.
+ It will require a rename of current fence-agents (unsupported agents) to fence-agents-unsupported.
Is that what you thought Rafael? Does this sound good to you Sergio?
I agree with your proposal Rafael. It will require changes in src:resource-agents and src:fence-agents but nothing in this MP, am I right? But with the following proposal I believe no changes will be needed in src:heartbeat:
- In src:resource-agents create a transitional binary package called resource-agents which will depend on resource- agents- unsupported and resource- agents- supported. agents- unsupported.
+ It will require a rename of current resource-agents (unsupported agents) to resource-
- In src:fence-agents create a new transitional binary package called fence-agents which will depend on resource- agents- unsupported and resource- agents- supported. unsupported.
+ It will require a rename of current fence-agents (unsupported agents) to fence-agents-
Is that what you thought Rafael? Does this sound good to you Sergio?