Code review comment for lp:~luc-demeyer/account-financial-tools/7.0-account_pain
Revision history for this message
| Raphaël Valyi - http://www.akretion.com (rvalyi) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Hello Pedro,
just to mention: in Brazil we are also account-payment biased so far (we
were inspired by NaN module like 4 years ago now). And we still have to
develop SEPA like format but for Brazil (CNAB). So we have more or less the
same problem as you. I'm not sure yet what approach is the best, but we
should definitely keep convergence in mind with account-payment and
banking-payment. I also mention that it looks that NaN and Ziakzak recently
ported the account-payment approach to Tryton (so they stick we it).
Regards.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Pedro Manuel Baeza
<email address hidden>wrote:
> Hi, I told about account-payment repository because I see that this
> feature is developed following account-payment approach instead of
> banking-payment, the same as, for example, spanish bank formats export.
>
> Maybe the two approaches can coexist?
>
> Regards.
> --
>
> https:/
> You are reviewing the proposed merge of
> lp:~luc-demeyer/account-financial-tools/7.0-account_pain into
> lp:account-financial-tools.
>