On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:16:23 -0000, Valentine Gostev <email address hidden> wrote:
> In general I agree, but making a separate test case anyway causes
> additional time expenses (unpacking tarball with server + system db
> install) compared to reloading sakila. See updated diff
we can fix execution time a number of ways in the future - having the
small, specific test cases though makes dev a lot easier.
e.g. the problem with the mysql test suite is that there are way too
many giant tests that test 143 things, making the first step of solving
a test failure being rewriting a test for the part of the test that
actuall fails and not the 100 other things that pass.
--
Stewart Smith
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:16:23 -0000, Valentine Gostev <email address hidden> wrote:
> In general I agree, but making a separate test case anyway causes
> additional time expenses (unpacking tarball with server + system db
> install) compared to reloading sakila. See updated diff
we can fix execution time a number of ways in the future - having the
small, specific test cases though makes dev a lot easier.
e.g. the problem with the mysql test suite is that there are way too
many giant tests that test 143 things, making the first step of solving
a test failure being rewriting a test for the part of the test that
actuall fails and not the 100 other things that pass.
--
Stewart Smith