-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Martin Pool wrote: > I think this would be reasonable to land directly to 2.1.1: > > * it's a bug (at least arguably) > * the change is quite small
Well, 2.1.0 is scheduled for Thurs, and we already have 1 or 2 bugfixes pending in that branch....
I certainly agree that this can go into the stable 2.1 series. (Arguably we could even get it into the 2.0 series...)
John =:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktoYKQACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMfigCfbN7pX6XxcbNYcGZxlNncA8n1 ahcAmQFajg7523LIbGs9m84yV0xZNPn8 =j5TX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
« Back to merge proposal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Pool wrote:
> I think this would be reasonable to land directly to 2.1.1:
>
> * it's a bug (at least arguably)
> * the change is quite small
Well, 2.1.0 is scheduled for Thurs, and we already have 1 or 2 bugfixes
pending in that branch....
I certainly agree that this can go into the stable 2.1 series. (Arguably
we could even get it into the 2.0 series...)
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
oYKQACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMfigCfbN7pX 6XxcbNYcGZxlNnc A8n1 IbGs9m84yV0xZNP n8
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkt
ahcAmQFajg7523L
=j5TX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----