> how much are we doing with pactl list sinks output that we need an entire parser for that!?
Apparently not much, as the patch I proposed here messed up grouping (the optional group was not non-capturing) and it still worked.
I would like to propose "The Three Strikes" rule for those quite-complex-but-probably-not-needed solutions.
Oh, and BTW. I just amended the fix with making the group non-capturing.
« Back to merge proposal
> how much are we doing with pactl list sinks output that we need an entire parser for that!?
Apparently not much, as the patch I proposed here messed up grouping (the optional group was not non-capturing) and it still worked.
I would like to propose "The Three Strikes" rule for those quite-complex- but-probably- not-needed solutions.
Oh, and BTW. I just amended the fix with making the group non-capturing.