Looks good.
Nit: + for(auto it = onscreen_buffers.begin(); it != onscreen_buffers.end(); it++) + { + if (it->use_count == 0) + map->send_buffer(it->buffer->id()); + }
Why not use a range-based for loop?
« Back to merge proposal
Looks good.
Nit: buffers. begin() ; it != onscreen_ buffers. end(); it++) buffer( it->buffer- >id());
+ for(auto it = onscreen_
+ {
+ if (it->use_count == 0)
+ map->send_
+ }
Why not use a range-based for loop?