> > You can't really have "pure" singleton with gobject (g_object_new (...)),
> > that's why everyone uses get_default.
>
> Sure you can, just override GObject->constructor(), but that aside. We agree
> on the solution :-)
>
Hmm, interesting, in that case people are just too lazy to do it I guess :)
> > You can't really have "pure" singleton with gobject (g_object_new (...)), >constructor( ), but that aside. We agree
> > that's why everyone uses get_default.
>
> Sure you can, just override GObject-
> on the solution :-)
>
Hmm, interesting, in that case people are just too lazy to do it I guess :)
The changes look fine, thanks.