Code review comment for lp:~justin-fathomdb/nova/justinsb-metadata

Jorge was saying in the api thread that he didn't think metadata should be used for tagging, it is supposed to be client only metadata. We should probably create something new ("tags? properties?"), although it seems fine to use metadata to test it out initially.

Vish

On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:18 PM, justinsb wrote:

> Eric: The suggestion from the mailing list was 'properties' because that's what Glance chose. The API uses 'metadata' (which I personally prefer), but was potentially confusing because SQLAlchemy has a Metadata object also (though it didn't cause any code problems). Are you voting that I change the API to 'properties' or that I go back to 'metadata'? If the former, am I allowed to just change the API?
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~justin-fathomdb/nova/justinsb-metadata/+merge/49902
> You are subscribed to branch lp:nova.