On Wednesday 05 Nov 2014 04:22:23 you wrote:
> I assume you are using two calls to assertThat instead of expectThat because
> if the lock was not acquired then you know it wouldn't have been released,
> correct? I.e., you can't get the second test to error unless the first one
> passes. This stood out to me and I had to ask because I know you love
> expectThat!
On Wednesday 05 Nov 2014 04:22:23 you wrote:
> I assume you are using two calls to assertThat instead of expectThat because
> if the lock was not acquired then you know it wouldn't have been released,
> correct? I.e., you can't get the second test to error unless the first one
> passes. This stood out to me and I had to ask because I know you love
> expectThat!
Correct :)