Code review comment for lp:~jr/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixes

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Thanks a lot for your fixes and your attention to detail.

I have a few quick questions though:

 - Why do you remove the section about libvigraimpex?
 - bzr commit instead of debcommit? (debcommit does much more than just 'bzr commit')
 - Do you think it makes sense to have two copies of the knowledge base article index?
 - the section following "Then determine the source package corresponding to this binary package::" seems to have been correct before.
 - Why do you leave the link to intrepid and remove the link to natty? (line 419)
 - Is "bzr tag" necessary nowadays?
 - Why do you remove the "update-maintainer" bits?

review: Needs Information

« Back to merge proposal