Code review comment for lp:~jr/bzr/bzr-gpgme

So I should clarify that while I agree with what needs to be done, we can
probably land this and do those bits as follow up cleanup. We don't want a
lot of drift, but I think this is incrementally better in all aspects, and
we shouldn't require it to be perfect. I'm sorry if I've been a bit
blockish, I have to remind myself sometimes. The rules for landing have
never been that it has to be perfect.

Merge: approve
John
=:->
On Jun 29, 2011 3:08 PM, "Jonathan Riddell" <email address hidden> wrote:
>>From discussion with JAM, needs to handle expired keys more gracefully,
should give different error for unknown and unacceptable key, gpg verify
should be commented so it can be easier understood and checked over by
someone knowledgeable in gpgme.
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/bzr/bzr-gpgme/+merge/64859
> Your team bzr-core is requested to review the proposed merge of
lp:~jr/bzr/bzr-gpgme into lp:bzr.