> Could you please provide overloaded << for all basic data types?
I'd be inclined to hold off with that for the moment. There is no point in adding an operator<< for floats if we don't have any place in the code where we want to log a float. All it means is that we end up having to write more code and tests, for no gain in functionality.
> Could you please provide overloaded << for all basic data types?
I'd be inclined to hold off with that for the moment. There is no point in adding an operator<< for floats if we don't have any place in the code where we want to log a float. All it means is that we end up having to write more code and tests, for no gain in functionality.