LGTM
Nice fix for the port handling
https://codereview.appspot.com/103270043/diff/40001/hooks/charmhelpers/core/services.py File hooks/charmhelpers/core/services.py (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/103270043/diff/40001/hooks/charmhelpers/core/services.py#newcode348 hooks/charmhelpers/core/services.py:348: for port in new_ports: Cool, thanks
https://codereview.appspot.com/103270043/diff/40001/hooks/config.py File hooks/config.py (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/103270043/diff/40001/hooks/config.py#newcode39 hooks/config.py:39: 'ports': [hookenv.config('port')], funny that we use the hookenv.config()['domain'] above and this here. I didn't recall that it even did per-key lookup :)
https://codereview.appspot.com/103270043/
« Back to merge proposal
LGTM
Nice fix for the port handling
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/103270043/ diff/40001/ hooks/charmhelp ers/core/ services. py ers/core/ services. py (right):
File hooks/charmhelp
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/103270043/ diff/40001/ hooks/charmhelp ers/core/ services. py#newcode348 ers/core/ services. py:348: for port in new_ports:
hooks/charmhelp
Cool, thanks
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/103270043/ diff/40001/ hooks/config. py
File hooks/config.py (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/103270043/ diff/40001/ hooks/config. py#newcode39 config( 'port') ], config( )['domain' ] above and this here. I
hooks/config.py:39: 'ports': [hookenv.
funny that we use the hookenv.
didn't recall that it even did per-key lookup :)
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/103270043/