Code review comment for lp:~jobh/dolfin/fast-array

>
> >> I agree. For all argments needing to be resized should use
> >> std::vector. Not sure where the resize functionality is/was used.
> >
> > It is possible (of course). There are quite a few user-exposed interfaces
> > that need changing (f.x. all the GeneralVector::set/get methods, since it
> > would be strange to just change the get methods).
>
> I did not anticipate using std::vector for these methods as these
> methods assume the user provides arrays with the correct size. It
> would cost too much to resize std::vector for these operations. Maybe
>

Not sure if we're talking about the same thing? PETScVector::get_local for
example uses resize() on the Array& that is passed as parameter.