Code review comment for lp:~jml/launchpad/vision-doc-split

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Lange (jml) wrote :

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Matthew Revell
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Thanks, it was nice to have an excuse to spend some time reading this again.
>
> I think the split works well.
>
> I should probably know this but why is this published at "http://lpqateam.canonical.com/doc/"? Presumably because we had that subdomain easily available to us.
>

Exactly. When we are being blocked on RTs for things that actually
affect users and developers, I figured I'd take what I could get.

> Also, I'd second Martin's call and suggest we make the link to this, from the dev wiki, more prominent. I need to spend some time fixing up the dev wiki in general.
>

As long as it's a link. I think having these on the wiki will lead to
them being more poorly maintained.

> I noticed something in the scope doc:
>
> "Many other forges exist to become more successful." I understand why you've used this wording and I feel that I am nitpicking here but I think we want Launchpad to become more successful, it's just that we have a different definition of success.
>

Fair call. Changed to "Many other forges define their success by how
many users they have."

jml

« Back to merge proposal