On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
> Excerpts from Kapil Thangavelu's message of 2012-09-06 18:01:26 UTC:
> > Thats an independent task and branch that should follow. At the moment no
> > one is using format-2, and we should have the right implementation in
> place
> > b4 documenting usage.
>
> I see it a bit different, in that I'd like to see a specification
> somewhere before the implementation is merged (not worked on.. just
> before it is merged).
>
>
This has been the subject of at least three threads on list, with the most
recent providing an exact specification of the delta.
> Either way, documentation of the format needs to be done before we cut
> a 0.6 release.
>
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
> Excerpts from Kapil Thangavelu's message of 2012-09-06 18:01:26 UTC:
> > Thats an independent task and branch that should follow. At the moment no
> > one is using format-2, and we should have the right implementation in
> place
> > b4 documenting usage.
>
> I see it a bit different, in that I'd like to see a specification
> somewhere before the implementation is merged (not worked on.. just
> before it is merged).
>
>
This has been the subject of at least three threads on list, with the most
recent providing an exact specification of the delta.
> Either way, documentation of the format needs to be done before we cut
> a 0.6 release.
>
Agreed.