> What I am most curious about is the "reverse" stuff.
> If the user explicitly searches for it should there be not-closely-matching
> results?
> Should "additional" results be weighted lower?
You're making a really good point here. I must agree using non ascii char is a value added to query information. In this case yes, the additional results might be weighted lower.
> What I am most curious about is the "reverse" stuff. matching
> If the user explicitly searches for it should there be not-closely-
> results?
> Should "additional" results be weighted lower?
You're making a really good point here. I must agree using non ascii char is a value added to query information. In this case yes, the additional results might be weighted lower.
I'll make some changes.