On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:17:08 -0000, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Hmm, perhaps we should force it to BZR_CONCURRENCY=1 if parallel isn't in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
>
> why? That would be slower than just not passing --parallel in. And
> unlike make -j, bzr won't spawn until death, it creates precisely the
> number of workers as there are cpus.
Well, don't pass --parallel in that case then.
I would think that the implied meaning of not passing parallel=n would
be parallel=1.
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:17:08 -0000, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Hmm, perhaps we should force it to BZR_CONCURRENCY=1 if parallel isn't in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
>
> why? That would be slower than just not passing --parallel in. And
> unlike make -j, bzr won't spawn until death, it creates precisely the
> number of workers as there are cpus.
Well, don't pass --parallel in that case then.
I would think that the implied meaning of not passing parallel=n would
be parallel=1.
Thanks,
James