Code review comment for lp:~jcsackett/charmworld/better-stats-window

Revision history for this message
j.c.sackett (jcsackett) wrote :

> Thanks. This looks good to me. In theory, I think we do want to do two
> fetches (open and <6 months old), so that the size of the response is
> proportional to the size of the data we want to evaluate. But I'm happy to
> wait until we need that.

Cool; I'll put in a comment in that function suggesting we want to re-evaluate it in time so the TODO doesn't get lost. Thanks!

« Back to merge proposal