Code review comment for lp:~jaypipes/glance/parallax-register-image

On 10/13/2010 11:00 AM, Michael Gundlach wrote:
> I think our goal was to conform to the RS API, not to conform to the Atom
> protocol. Then again, we're planning to iterate on the API shortly after
> Austin, so I'm not positive what this buys us.

We need to conform as much as possible to the RS API until they release
1.1 and hand off API development to us. At that point we can
diverge/fix in future versions.

I am not commenting on the technical merits of this discussion though.

> cc'ing a couple of people from whom I've heard the "conform to the RS API"
> message, to get their second opinions.
>
> Michael
>