On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Javier Derderian <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Copyright headers look odd, no?
>
> yes they do. They're the same in lots of original BzrEclipse files, like LocationInputDialog.java
I think Martin is talking about the copyright in SendAction.java, as
it might be a similar copyright in other files of bzr-eclipse, it's
wrong (my fault, sorry for the confusion). Looks like that a search &
replace didn't worked as expected.
Most of the files have a placeholder for the LICENSE/COPYRIGHT, that I
should complete.
>
>
> what should be there?
I think that as Canonical is the sponsor of this work, the copyright
belongs to them, but that depends on the arrangement/contract you
signed.
About the license, I know it's not clear. I think that using EPL it's
ok. but don't know if a specific license should be used (as part of
your contract with them).
Hi Javier,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Javier Derderian <email address hidden> wrote: alog.java
>> Copyright headers look odd, no?
>
> yes they do. They're the same in lots of original BzrEclipse files, like LocationInputDi
I think Martin is talking about the copyright in SendAction.java, as
it might be a similar copyright in other files of bzr-eclipse, it's
wrong (my fault, sorry for the confusion). Looks like that a search &
replace didn't worked as expected.
Most of the files have a placeholder for the LICENSE/COPYRIGHT, that I
should complete.
>
>
> what should be there?
I think that as Canonical is the sponsor of this work, the copyright contract you
belongs to them, but that depends on the arrangement/
signed.
About the license, I know it's not clear. I think that using EPL it's
ok. but don't know if a specific license should be used (as part of
your contract with them).
Cheers,
> -- /code.edge. launchpad. net/~javierder/ bzr-eclipse/ send_command/ +merge/ 5676
> https:/
> You are requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~javierder/bzr-eclipse/send_command into lp:bzr-eclipse.
>