On 04/20/2011 07:50 PM, Martin [gz] wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
> SVG changes look fine.
>
> The PNG you posted in the bug has a transparent background, is that intentional? It made the text illegible against black for me. I've posted a copy with a white background that also optimises slightly smaller.
>
> I've not examined the PDF.
>
>
The original PNG was transparent, so I assume the new PNG should be as
well. The PDF is not transparent.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/20/2011 07:50 PM, Martin [gz] wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
> SVG changes look fine.
>
> The PNG you posted in the bug has a transparent background, is that intentional? It made the text illegible against black for me. I've posted a copy with a white background that also optimises slightly smaller.
>
> I've not examined the PDF.
>
>
The original PNG was transparent, so I assume the new PNG should be as
well. The PDF is not transparent.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
vLPIACgkQJdeBCY SNAANz6QCguW71+ UMRHDeQBvZfQqwo v02m qiuJFZtSprOpGFL it
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk2
2OEAoJIIi1uG9gb
=1KCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----