>>>>> John Arbash Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
> On 8/30/2010 9:53 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> As a data point, I still can't get any email from PQM on failures.
>>
>> I just had to reproduce a problem and the raw selftest.log containing the uncompressed,
>> unfiltered, selftest.log is 47M.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure about which stream is sent on failure but I suspect it is this one.
>>
>> So, for debugging purposes, I don't like removing stuff.
>> But I currently get *nothing* so can we step back a bit and addresses this
>> problem once and for all ?
>>
>> Should we send a very short mail on failures with an url to get the whole stream for example ?
> Do you really feel that including the log output for xfail, skip, and
> success is adding useful info?
No. But you forgot 'not applicable' :-P
> *I* feel it is just adding a lot of noise with almost 0 signal...
Right, so ISTM that we agree about two things:
- we want the list of tests and their status (pass/fail/skip etc.)
- we care about log only for failures.
Don't we get that by simply *not* using subunit on pqm ?
>>>>> John Arbash Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
> On 8/30/2010 9:53 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> As a data point, I still can't get any email from PQM on failures.
>>
>> I just had to reproduce a problem and the raw selftest.log containing the uncompressed,
>> unfiltered, selftest.log is 47M.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure about which stream is sent on failure but I suspect it is this one.
>>
>> So, for debugging purposes, I don't like removing stuff.
>> But I currently get *nothing* so can we step back a bit and addresses this
>> problem once and for all ?
>>
>> Should we send a very short mail on failures with an url to get the whole stream for example ?
> Do you really feel that including the log output for xfail, skip, and
> success is adding useful info?
No. But you forgot 'not applicable' :-P
> *I* feel it is just adding a lot of noise with almost 0 signal...
Right, so ISTM that we agree about two things:
- we want the list of tests and their status (pass/fail/skip etc.)
- we care about log only for failures.
Don't we get that by simply *not* using subunit on pqm ?
Or is pqm.bazaar-cvs.org *requiring* subunit ?