On 8/16/2011 4:27 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Review: Approve I have only briefly glanced over this. I've
> specifically checked the overriding of attributes and
> iter_reverse_revision_history. That all looks good to me.
>
> It would be useful to test this with 2.4, in case this uses anything
> that relies on 2.5 or 2.6. I can't find anything when looking
> manually.
I'm not sure what you mean by 2.4. But we already have this landed into
the 2.4 series, using the newer apis.
When I merge this up, I plan on using whatever apis are available at
each stage.
And I did make sure that:
a) The test suite passes
b) Activating the "DONT_*" tests that actually connect to launchpad and
make a query and parse the result also still pass.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8/16/2011 4:27 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: revision_ history. That all looks good to me.
> Review: Approve I have only briefly glanced over this. I've
> specifically checked the overriding of attributes and
> iter_reverse_
>
> It would be useful to test this with 2.4, in case this uses anything
> that relies on 2.5 or 2.6. I can't find anything when looking
> manually.
I'm not sure what you mean by 2.4. But we already have this landed into
the 2.4 series, using the newer apis.
When I merge this up, I plan on using whatever apis are available at
each stage.
And I did make sure that:
a) The test suite passes
b) Activating the "DONT_*" tests that actually connect to launchpad and
make a query and parse the result also still pass.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk5 KfxoACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMr3QCgt8cHc fB33bSHg+ tPnNzFKY5I Q9uNUg/ mNCcgSPzqj
/p8AnRZpY9lxZZy
=RlmU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----