Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Thanks for that.
>
> I fail to see what can possibly go wrong, why is why I agree we should land it in 2.1 first ;)
>
> For the sake of example, you could have used the shell-like tests here, up to the run_bzr part.
>
>
Except I feel that setting up the test should be done in bzrlib code and
not in 'shell' code. If I wanted to do that, I would have used 'run_bzr'
everywhere.
But thanks for the review.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Thanks for that.
>
> I fail to see what can possibly go wrong, why is why I agree we should land it in 2.1 first ;)
>
> For the sake of example, you could have used the shell-like tests here, up to the run_bzr part.
>
>
Except I feel that setting up the test should be done in bzrlib code and
not in 'shell' code. If I wanted to do that, I would have used 'run_bzr'
everywhere.
But thanks for the review. enigmail. mozdev. org/
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkr wkAwACgkQJdeBCY SNAAN6lwCfS5vCl 72+7xNIFd9hI7Kx Gy6t xkkvKBgKZyW46zC vm
VmQAn3HTairobpU
=/SJL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----