Code review comment for lp:~jameinel/bzr/2.0-full-version

> This changes 'bzr --version' to always print the full 3-tuple of
> major.minor.micro
>
> So instead of getting "bzr v2.0" you get "bzr v2.0.0".

Absolutely. If we expect a reasonable likelihood of a 2.0.1, we
should _definitely_ have a 2.0.0 instead of a 2.0. And having a 2.0.0
that calls itself 2.0 would just be nuts.

--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | <email address hidden>
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.