On 29-Aug-2013 10:08, Martin Owens wrote:
> David, you might have to rebase your patch.
If you translate that into specific bzr operations I will try. I think
I know what you mean, but I was not the one who submitted the merge
patch
to put lp988601 changes into trunk.
> It looks like you caught
> a revert on the bad side.
Is that possibly related to the dialogscript messages issue that is
present in
lp988601 since Kris last merged things in from Trunk?
On 29-Aug-2013 10:08, Martin Owens wrote:
> David, you might have to rebase your patch.
If you translate that into specific bzr operations I will try. I think
I know what you mean, but I was not the one who submitted the merge
patch
to put lp988601 changes into trunk.
> It looks like you caught
> a revert on the bad side.
Is that possibly related to the dialogscript messages issue that is
present in
lp988601 since Kris last merged things in from Trunk?
Thanks,
David Mathog
<email address hidden>
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech