Excerpts from Gustavo Niemeyer's message of Mon Sep 26 13:15:39 UTC 2011:
> Review: Approve
>
> This looks very nice too, thanks!
>
> Just a couple of details:
>
>
> [1]
>
> + elif provider_type == "lxc":
>
> Please do not forget to rename the provider type to "local"
> before making this public.
sounds good, i'll put another branch in for the rename.
>
> [2]
>
> + output = subprocess.check_output(["hostname", "-f"])
>
> Why is this different for orchestra? Won't this fail if thethe release.
> machine doesn't have a properly assigned domain name? I suspect
> it will, and suggest using the same implementation of the local
> case there as well.
>
orchestra asserts that hostname is a valid fqdn. after long discussion on irc,
it seems that this is the most appropriate thing, and helps us get the
equivalent lines out of charms.
Excerpts from Gustavo Niemeyer's message of Mon Sep 26 13:15:39 UTC 2011:
> Review: Approve
>
> This looks very nice too, thanks!
>
> Just a couple of details:
>
>
> [1]
>
> + elif provider_type == "lxc":
>
> Please do not forget to rename the provider type to "local"
> before making this public.
sounds good, i'll put another branch in for the rename.
> check_output( ["hostname" , "-f"])
> [2]
>
> + output = subprocess.
>
> Why is this different for orchestra? Won't this fail if thethe release.
> machine doesn't have a properly assigned domain name? I suspect
> it will, and suggest using the same implementation of the local
> case there as well.
>
orchestra asserts that hostname is a valid fqdn. after long discussion on irc,
it seems that this is the most appropriate thing, and helps us get the
equivalent lines out of charms.
cheers,
Kapil