Code review comment for lp:~gz/bzr/tests_for_bug_205636

Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

Yeah, your two alternative spellings there are much clearer. I'll leave this branch unchanged for the moment though as that was a temporary hack that's going away.

Having a real expectError method would both keep the exc_info unmolested and avoid the need for try/except, but was out of scope here.

« Back to merge proposal