Code review comment for lp:~gl-az/percona-xtrabackup/2.0-io-block-size
Revision history for this message
| George Ormond Lorch III (gl-az) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Completely agree, I even looked into it a bit. I'm pretty sure you're
right though, it would need some sync in order to make it deterministic.
I certainly see this situation 'passing' in my local brute force tests
but it would be _really_ nice to have more of this sort of test in the
suite.
On 5/1/2013 10:12 AM, Stewart Smith wrote:
> George Ormond Lorch III <email address hidden> writes:
>> - Not tested as part of any test is a page that has been read and
>> failed validation, then re-read and passed.
> This would be a really awesome test to have however... I'm not sure if
> Alexey has any ideas of how we might do this with debug sync and the
> like... but I think it could be quite worthwhile to have a test.
>
--
George O. Lorch III
Software Engineer, Percona
+1-888-401-3401 x542 US/Arizona (GMT -7)
skype: george.