On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:45 PM, j.c.sackett wrote:
> Review: Approve > Gary-- > > This looks good. I see one possible problem in the updated profile template, pointed out below.
...
> > I may be misunderstanding this, but shouldn't this be "separated with ambersands" as shown in the example?
Ah, yes, thanks, good catch!
> There's no problem in the above bit, just thought that was one hell of a generator expression. :-P
Yeah...not the prettiest thing in the world. Maybe I should have been more explicit/less concise...
Thanks again,
Gary
« Back to merge proposal
On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:45 PM, j.c.sackett wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Gary--
>
> This looks good. I see one possible problem in the updated profile template, pointed out below.
...
>
> I may be misunderstanding this, but shouldn't this be "separated with ambersands" as shown in the example?
Ah, yes, thanks, good catch!
...
> There's no problem in the above bit, just thought that was one hell of a generator expression. :-P
Yeah...not the prettiest thing in the world. Maybe I should have been more explicit/less concise...
Thanks again,
Gary