Code review comment for lp:~fwereade/pyjuju/isolate-formula-revisions

Revision history for this message
William Reade (fwereade) wrote :

> That's the core of the problem: that I thought I'd done enough damage in the
> last week or so, and that it would be important *not* to break charm-state
> storage and thus have to bump topology.VERSION. I'll go ahead with the nicer
> but more disruptive approach you propose in a stacked branch.

But... just possibly... we don't actually need .revision on metadata *at all*, because CharmState takes if from a CharmURL. Stacking it anyway, just to be safe.

« Back to merge proposal