looks reasonable, but what's the deal with the new errors package?
https://codereview.appspot.com/10178043/diff/1/charm/repo.go File charm/repo.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10178043/diff/1/charm/repo.go#newcode295 charm/repo.go:295: return &NotFoundError{fmt.Sprintf("charm not found in %q: %s", repoPath, curl)} shouldn't this be using errors.NotFoundf ?
https://codereview.appspot.com/10178043/
« Back to merge proposal
looks reasonable, but what's the deal with the new errors package?
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/10178043/ diff/1/ charm/repo. go
File charm/repo.go (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/10178043/ diff/1/ charm/repo. go#newcode295 fmt.Sprintf( "charm not found in
charm/repo.go:295: return &NotFoundError{
%q: %s", repoPath, curl)}
shouldn't this be using errors.NotFoundf ?
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/10178043/