https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/diff/4002/docs/process.rst#newcode128
docs/process.rst:128: - In the ``build-prod`` directory, under the
uncompressed one, start a server:
On 2013/01/03 14:01:52, benji wrote:
> I can't parse this. The "under the uncompressed one" part is what
throws me
> off. I /think/ this is what it should say: "While still in the
directory where
> you extracted the tar file, change to the build-prod directory and
start a
> server:..."
> That might be better as two steps: one to change to the directory and
one to
> start the server.
Thanks Benji.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/4002/ docs/process. rst
File docs/process.rst (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/4002/ docs/process. rst#newcode123 rst:123: ``FINAL=1 make test-debug``.
docs/process.
On 2013/01/03 14:01:52, benji wrote:
> Do you really need "FINAL=1" for tests? The last time I looked at the
Makefile
> it didn't change the way tests worked.
As discussed on IRC, I'll leave this workaround waiting for /bugs.launchpad .net/juju- gui/+bug/ 1095663 to be fixed.
https:/
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/4002/ docs/process. rst#newcode128 rst:128: - In the ``build-prod`` directory, under the
docs/process.
uncompressed one, start a server:
On 2013/01/03 14:01:52, benji wrote:
> I can't parse this. The "under the uncompressed one" part is what
throws me
> off. I /think/ this is what it should say: "While still in the
directory where
> you extracted the tar file, change to the build-prod directory and
start a
> server:..."
> That might be better as two steps: one to change to the directory and
one to
> start the server.
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/4002/ docs/process. rst#newcode196 rst:196: - In the ``build-prod`` directory, start a server:
docs/process.
On 2013/01/03 14:01:52, benji wrote:
> Should this line should be identical to the parallel step in the
stable release
> instructions (line 128)?
You are right, done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/