Thanks for the review Nicola.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/diff/1/docs/process.rst File docs/process.rst (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/diff/1/docs/process.rst#newcode109 docs/process.rst:109: - If you are using a pre-existing branch, make sure it is up-to-date:: On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote: > No need for double colons in the two lines above.
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/diff/1/docs/process.rst#newcode128 docs/process.rst:128: - In the ``build-prod`` directory, inside the uncompressed one, start a server: On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote: > s/inside/under/
https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/diff/1/docs/process.rst#newcode183 docs/process.rst:183: - If you are using a pre-existing branch, make sure it is up-to-date:: On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote: > No need for double colons in the two lines above.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7039049/
« Back to merge proposal
Thanks for the review Nicola.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/1/ docs/process. rst
File docs/process.rst (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/1/ docs/process. rst#newcode109 rst:109: - If you are using a pre-existing branch, make
docs/process.
sure it is up-to-date::
On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote:
> No need for double colons in the two lines above.
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/1/ docs/process. rst#newcode128 rst:128: - In the ``build-prod`` directory, inside the
docs/process.
uncompressed one, start a server:
On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote:
> s/inside/under/
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/ diff/1/ docs/process. rst#newcode183 rst:183: - If you are using a pre-existing branch, make
docs/process.
sure it is up-to-date::
On 2013/01/03 12:06:30, teknico wrote:
> No need for double colons in the two lines above.
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/7039049/