Ack, thanks for clarification Marc. This should not be merged.
My conclusion now is that the issue is on the webpage tooling end: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu.com/issues/13498
Does that sound reasonable to others? If so, I'll update that issue with a comment for the web team.
They should be able to add an anchor link to our output `<source>: <url>` or `<source>: <url> (<note>)`.
Also, what is happening here: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-48795 o.o
« Back to merge proposal
Ack, thanks for clarification Marc. This should not be merged.
My conclusion now is that the issue is on the webpage tooling end: https:/ /github. com/canonical/ ubuntu. com/issues/ 13498
Does that sound reasonable to others? If so, I'll update that issue with a comment for the web team.
They should be able to add an anchor link to our output `<source>: <url>` or `<source>: <url> (<note>)`.
Also, what is happening here: https:/ /ubuntu. com/security/ CVE-2023- 48795 o.o