> * The version number really should be 1.1.9-0ubuntu1.
Even if I NMU it into Debian? ;-)
> * We shouldn't change source format just because we don't have any
> packages.
I assume you mean patches? If so, sorry, but why not? There are no
upstream changes anymore so making it source format 1 makes it easier to
backport to older distributions and AFAICS doesn't have any negative
side effects. What am I missing?
Stefano Rivera <email address hidden> writes:
> * The version number really should be 1.1.9-0ubuntu1.
Even if I NMU it into Debian? ;-)
> * We shouldn't change source format just because we don't have any
> packages.
I assume you mean patches? If so, sorry, but why not? There are no
upstream changes anymore so making it source format 1 makes it easier to
backport to older distributions and AFAICS doesn't have any negative
side effects. What am I missing?
> * E: libstomp-ruby: ruby-script- but-no- ruby-dep usr/bin/catstomp but-no- ruby-dep usr/bin/stompcat
> E: libstomp-ruby: ruby-script-
Well, it has an indirect dependency via libstomp-ruby1.8 |
libstomp-ruby1.9.1. I guess I can make it an explicit dependency, if
you want.
--
James