Code review comment for lp:~elachuni/wsgi-oops/no-more-twisted

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Anthony Lenton
<email address hidden> wrote:
> The code is taken literally from twisted so it should be completely backwards compatible, not need new tests or break existing ones.

What does this mean for copyright? Who has copyright on the code that
was added? Or did you just re-implement this simple function yourself,
and the way that twisted had done it was the obvious way to write the
code?

I ask because I think Canonical requires that we maintain 100%
copyright over projects where we are the primary authors, so I want to
be careful about introducing code that is not accompanied by a
copyright assignment.
--
Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/