> but I would be thinking about something like:
> # discovery part logs the suites and test cases found
> test_suites = discover_test_suites(DT_PATH)
I definitely agree we need something like this. I was going to suggest an option such as --test-info that would return information about applications, test suites, test cases. Possibly with some options as to what is returned.
I think if we go down this route we would get a cleaner division between test discovery, test selection and running tests.
Hello,
I think these are good suggestions . . .
> but I would be thinking about something like: test_suites( DT_PATH)
> # discovery part logs the suites and test cases found
> test_suites = discover_
I definitely agree we need something like this. I was going to suggest an option such as --test-info that would return information about applications, test suites, test cases. Possibly with some options as to what is returned.
I think if we go down this route we would get a cleaner division between test discovery, test selection and running tests.
Cheers,
Jason.