On 11/20/2012 11:16 AM, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Actually, the sensible behaviour is for l-m-c to, by default, use the default boot loader if none is specified, since they have to inspect the hwpack anyway. Then they'll immediately fail if the requested one doesn't exist.
yeah, that's what I was trying to say. sorry I wasn't clear.
On 11/20/2012 11:16 AM, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Actually, the sensible behaviour is for l-m-c to, by default, use the default boot loader if none is specified, since they have to inspect the hwpack anyway. Then they'll immediately fail if the requested one doesn't exist.
yeah, that's what I was trying to say. sorry I wasn't clear.