> I do.
>
> + ui.ui_factory.show_message('%d conflict(s) resolved.' %
> resolved)
> + unresolved = tree.conflicts()
> + if len(unresolved) > 0:
> + ui.ui_factory.show_message('Remaining conflicts:')
> + for conflict in unresolved:
> + ui.ui_factory.show_message(str(conflict))
>
*blink*, I missed that, sorry.
Still, auto does:
for conflict in un_resolved: trace.note(conflict) return 1 else: trace.note('All conflicts resolved.') return 0
So if you want to do the same, I'll be fine, but let's do exactly the same then, use trace.note() and return some corresponding value.
> > The other cases mentions the number of remaining conflicts, I think you
> don't.
>
> If you would prefer just the number of remaining conflicts, I can do
> that instead.
That's also an option, I think the idea with mentioning only the number is that it would satisfy users who prefer less verbose output and can still see the conflicts with 'bzr conflicts -v'.
In any case, addressing such unification can be done in a further submission as long as you don't introduce another variation (which you don't expect for the details raised above).
> I do. show_message( '%d conflict(s) resolved.' % show_message( 'Remaining conflicts:') show_message( str(conflict) )
>
> + ui.ui_factory.
> resolved)
> + unresolved = tree.conflicts()
> + if len(unresolved) > 0:
> + ui.ui_factory.
> + for conflict in unresolved:
> + ui.ui_factory.
>
*blink*, I missed that, sorry.
Still, auto does:
So if you want to do the same, I'll be fine, but let's do exactly the same then, use trace.note() and return some corresponding value.
> > The other cases mentions the number of remaining conflicts, I think you
> don't.
>
> If you would prefer just the number of remaining conflicts, I can do
> that instead.
That's also an option, I think the idea with mentioning only the number is that it would satisfy users who prefer less verbose output and can still see the conflicts with 'bzr conflicts -v'.
In any case, addressing such unification can be done in a further submission as long as you don't introduce another variation (which you don't expect for the details raised above).