Code review comment for lp:~dimitern/juju-core/382-api-provisioner-machine-nics

Revision history for this message
William Reade (fwereade) wrote :

I'm a bit disappointed that we're making this so chatty, when ISTM that
we could pack all this into SetProvisioned, but... well, deadlines are
tight and internal APIs are much easier to change in future. Let it
stand, I guess :).

https://codereview.appspot.com/84570043/

« Back to merge proposal