On 2014/03/28 04:42:14, dfc wrote:
> Please take a look.
LGTM
+1 to moving NewAddress(es)
There is one non-test place where NewAddress is used, and in that case
it legitimately does not know the address's scope. It would be good to
make that explicit anyhow.
On 2014/03/28 04:42:14, dfc wrote:
> Please take a look.
LGTM
+1 to moving NewAddress(es)
There is one non-test place where NewAddress is used, and in that case
it legitimately does not know the address's scope. It would be good to
make that explicit anyhow.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/81720043/